California’s 400-Foot Stadium Drone Bill Reaches the Governor: What It Means for Event Airspace

California lawmakers passed AB 2113, establishing a $500 fine for flying within 400 feet of outdoor concerts and sporting events. With Governor Newsom facing a September 30 deadline, the bill reignites the legal battle over federal airspace preemption.

California’s 400-Foot Stadium Drone Bill Reaches the Governor: What It Means for Event Airspace
Outdoor sports stadium packed with spectators at night with a glowing virtual boundary line above it

The Brief

On 27 August 2026 the California Legislature passed Assembly Bill 2113 in a unanimous 76–0 concurrence vote, sending the measure to Governor Gavin Newsom for signature or veto by 30 September 2026. The legislation makes it a state infraction, punishable by a $500 fine, to operate an unauthorized drone within 400 feet of, or directly above, ticketed outdoor entertainment events or amusement parks with a capacity of 1,000 people or more. While backed by concert promoters and venue operators seeking to halt unauthorized aerial recording and spectator hazards, the bill pushes directly into a long-standing constitutional battle: whether state legislatures have the legal authority to carve out local no-fly zones in airspace exclusively regulated by the FAA.

If you fly commercial drone jobs in California, a familiar regulatory conflict is about to land on the flight line.

Assembly Bill 2113, introduced by Assemblymember Tina McKinnor and championed by major entertainment conglomerates, targets the growing issue of rogue drone incursions over outdoor concerts, music festivals, and packed sports stadiums.

Under current federal rules, the FAA maintains permanent flight restrictions over Major League Baseball, NFL, NCAA football, and major motor speedway events with seating capacities of 30,000 or more (14 CFR § 99.7). But for mid-sized outdoor concert amphitheaters, local county fairs, or private music venues holding 1,500 to 10,000 fans, securing a federal Temporary Flight Restriction (TFR) is rarely approved by the FAA.

California’s bill attempts to close that gap from Sacramento:

  • The Restriction: Prohibits unauthorized drone operations directly above or within 400 feet lateral distance of an outdoor ticketed performance, concert, athletic competition, or amusement park.
  • The Threshold: Applies to any venue with a capacity of 1,000 attendees or more.
  • The Penalty: A state infraction carrying a $500 fine.
  • The Exemptions: Permitted commercial operators contracted by the venue, utility maintenance crews, and public safety personnel (police, fire, emergency medical) acting in an official capacity are exempt.

The Preemption Dilemma for Working Pilots

For Part 107 pilots, the immediate concern is not unauthorized concert filming—it is the erosion of consistent airspace rules.

Federal statute gives the Federal Aviation Administration sole, exclusive sovereignty over the National Airspace System from the blade of grass to the stratosphere (49 U.S.C. § 40103). Historically, federal courts have struck down municipal and state ordinances that attempt to regulate navigable airspace altitude, flight paths, or drone operations, ruling them preempted by federal law (most notably Singer v. City of Newton).

If AB 2113 is signed into law:

  1. Local Police Enforcement: Local law enforcement officers—who generally cannot cite FAA regulations—gain direct state statutory authority to issue $500 tickets to drone pilots operating near event boundaries.
  2. Conflicting Boundaries: A pilot could be operating completely legally under FAA Part 107 regulations in Class G uncontrolled airspace with clear airspace authorization, yet face a local state police citation because a concert venue exists 350 feet away.
  3. Legal Challenge Looming: Aviation legal experts anticipate an immediate federal court challenge on preemption grounds if signed, forcing judges to decide once again whether state police power stops at the property line or extends 400 feet into the sky.

Flight-Ready Breakdown

State Airspace Law

The California Legislature passed AB 2113, establishing a state infraction and a $500 fine for flying within 400 feet of ticketed outdoor events with 1,000+ capacity. Governor Newsom has until 30 September 2026 to sign or veto the measure.

Commercial and recreational remote pilots operating in California, event venue directors, public safety agencies, and commercial cinematography flight leads.

If signed, it creates a state-level airspace restriction bypassing the FAA’s standard TFR process, inviting federal preemption lawsuits while granting local police direct statutory authority to ticket drone operators.

If flying in California near entertainment venues or stadiums, verify event calendars within 400 feet of your flight perimeter. If contracted to film, ensure your venue contract and landowner permission are written, dated, and in your flight kit. Continue strictly observing 14 CFR § 107.39 prohibitions on operations over people.

Do not assume AB 2113 is in effect today—it requires the Governor’s signature. Do not assume an FAA LAANC authorization protects you from a state police ticket. Do not assume private event security guards have legal authority to confiscate your aircraft or equipment.

Sources

The Drone Pilot Brief does not accept payment for editorial coverage.

Ray Richardson

About Ray Richardson

Part 107 Commercial UAS Operator, former manned aviation journalist, and Editor-in-Chief of The Drone Pilot Brief. Specializing in regulatory workflows, GIS mapping telemetry, and advanced fleet operations.